Skip to content

Migrating from GitHub Copilot

Your guide to upgrading from GitHub Copilot’s inline suggestions to the full agent capabilities of Cursor IDE or Claude Code.

While GitHub Copilot excels at inline code completion, modern AI development tools offer significantly more:

From Suggestions to Agent

Copilot: Inline autocomplete suggestions Cursor/Claude: Full autonomous agents that plan, execute, and test

From Single to Multi-File

Copilot: Works within current file Cursor/Claude: Coordinates changes across entire codebase

From 8K to 200K Context

Copilot: Limited context window Cursor/Claude: Massive context for complex operations

From Passive to Interactive

Copilot: Waits for you to type Cursor/Claude: Actively helps plan and execute tasks

FeatureGitHub CopilotCursor IDEClaude Code
Inline Suggestions✅ Excellent✅ Tab completions❌ CLI-based
Multi-File Edits✅ Agent mode✅ Powerful
Codebase UnderstandingLimited✅ Full indexing✅ Agentic search
Context Window~8K tokens120K tokens200K tokens
Test GenerationBasic✅ Full suite✅ With execution
RefactoringSingle file✅ Project-wide✅ Autonomous
Debugging✅ BugBot✅ Deep analysis
Planning✅ Todo lists✅ /think mode
  1. Assess Your Needs

    • Are you happy with just autocomplete? → Maybe stay with Copilot
    • Need multi-file refactoring? → Upgrade to Cursor/Claude
    • Want autonomous coding agents? → Definitely upgrade
    • Heavy terminal user? → Consider Claude Code
  2. Choose Your Tool

    • You love VS Code interface
    • Want smooth transition from Copilot
    • Prefer visual feedback
    • Need team collaboration features
    • Value integrated debugging
  3. Run Both During Transition

    Terminal window
    # Keep Copilot active initially
    # Use Cursor/Claude for complex tasks
    # Gradually shift more work to new tool
    # Disable Copilot when comfortable
  4. Import Your Workflow

    • Cursor: Import VS Code settings automatically
    • Claude Code: Works alongside any IDE
    • Keep familiar keybindings
    • Maintain project structure

From Copilot Autocomplete to Agent Delegation

Section titled “From Copilot Autocomplete to Agent Delegation”

Old Way with Copilot

// Type comment, wait for suggestion
// Accept with Tab, modify manually
// Repeat for each function
// Handle multi-file changes yourself

New Way with Cursor/Claude

// Agent: "Refactor this module to use TypeScript"
// AI: Plans changes across 15 files
// AI: Implements with proper types
// AI: Updates imports everywhere
// AI: Runs tests to verify

With Copilot:

  1. Write function signature
  2. Accept autocomplete suggestions
  3. Manually add error handling
  4. Write tests separately
  5. Update documentation

With Cursor Agent: “Add a user avatar upload feature with validation, error handling, and tests”

  • Agent creates complete implementation
  • Includes all edge cases
  • Generates comprehensive tests
  • Updates relevant documentation

Missing Inline Suggestions

Challenge: “I miss Copilot’s constant suggestions”

Solution with Cursor: Tab completions provide similar experience

Solution with Claude: Use IDE plugin for quick access, delegate larger tasks to CLI

Information Overload

Challenge: “The AI does too much at once”

Solution: Start with small, focused tasks. Gradually increase scope as you build trust

Context Management

Challenge: “How do I provide the right context?”

Solution: Use @ symbols in Cursor, CLAUDE.md files in Claude Code. Let AI search for context

Cost Concerns

Challenge: “It’s twice as expensive as Copilot”

Solution: Track productivity gains. Most users report 2-5x efficiency improvement, easily justifying cost

  1. Week 1: Use alongside Copilot

    • Complex tasks → Cursor/Claude
    • Quick edits → Copilot
  2. Week 2: Increase new tool usage

    • Disable Copilot for a day
    • Note productivity differences
  3. Week 3: Full transition

    • Cancel Copilot if convinced
    • Document learned patterns

Once you’ve migrated, ensure you’re getting full value:

Advanced Features to Master

  1. Multi-File Operations: Don’t just edit one file at a time
  2. Agent Planning: Let AI plan before executing
  3. Test Generation: Always ask for tests with features
  4. Documentation: Have AI maintain docs as it codes
  5. Code Review: Use AI to review before pushing

Productivity Metrics to Track

  • Feature Velocity: Stories completed per sprint
  • Code Quality: Bug rates, test coverage
  • Time Saved: Hours per week on routine tasks
  • Learning Curve: Time to proficiency
  • Team Satisfaction: Developer happiness scores
  • Budget Conscious: Copilot ($10) + Claude Code Pro ($20) = $30/month
  • Maximum Power: Cursor Ultra ($200) + Keep Copilot ($10) = $210/month
  • Team Approach: Copilot for juniors, Cursor/Claude for seniors

Stay with Copilot If...

  • You only need inline completions
  • Your work is mostly single-file edits
  • Budget is extremely tight ($10 max)
  • You’re happy with current productivity
  • Team has no appetite for change

Upgrade to Cursor/Claude If...

  • You want AI to handle complex tasks
  • Multi-file refactoring is common
  • You’re ready for 2-5x productivity
  • Budget allows $20-200/month
  • You want cutting-edge AI capabilities

Ready to upgrade from Copilot? Here’s your action plan:

  1. Start a Free Trial: Both Cursor and Claude Code offer trials
  2. Run a Pilot Project: Test on non-critical code first
  3. Measure Results: Track time saved and code quality
  4. Make the Switch: Cancel Copilot once convinced
  5. Share Knowledge: Help teammates migrate successfully