PR Template
## AI Review Checklist- [ ] Security scan passed- [ ] Performance analysis done- [ ] Test coverage adequate- [ ] Documentation updated
## AI Summary<!-- cursor:summary -->
Transforming individual productivity gains into team-wide success requires thoughtful collaboration strategies. These final tips focus on scaling Cursor usage across development teams while maintaining consistency, quality, and shared learning.
Establish a centralized configuration repository:
Create team configuration repo
mkdir cursor-team-configcd cursor-team-configgit init
# Structure├── .cursor/│ ├── rules/ # Shared coding standards│ ├── mcp-servers/ # Team MCP configurations│ └── settings/ # Recommended settings├── scripts/ # Setup automation├── templates/ # Project templates└── README.md # Setup instructions
Create installation script
#!/bin/bashecho "Setting up Cursor team configuration..."
# Copy rulescp -r .cursor/rules ~/.cursor/rules-team/
# Install MCP serversnpm install -g $(cat .cursor/mcp-servers/package.json)
# Apply settingscursor --install-extension ./extensions/team-pack.vsix
echo "Configuration complete!"
Maintain with git
# Team members clone and stay updatedgit clone team-config-repo./scripts/setup-cursor.sh
# Regular updatesgit pull && ./scripts/sync-config.sh
Create consistent AI behavior across all team projects:
## Code Standards- Use TypeScript with strict mode- Follow ESLint configuration in .eslintrc- Prefer functional programming patterns- Write tests for all new features
## Architecture Patterns- Repository pattern for data access- Service layer for business logic- Controller layer for HTTP handling- Use dependency injection
## Documentation- JSDoc for all public APIs- README for each module- Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
@extends team-base
## API Specific Rules- All endpoints must have OpenAPI docs- Use versioned routes (/v1, /v2)- Implement rate limiting- Standard error response format: { "error": { "code": "ERROR_CODE", "message": "Human readable message", "details": {} } }
Standardize tool integrations across the team:
{ "mcpServers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${env:GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "linear": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-linear"], "config": { "workspace": "team-workspace-id" } }, "postgres-dev": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-postgres", "${env:DATABASE_URL}"] }, "custom-docs": { "command": "node", "args": ["./mcp-servers/docs-server.js"], "description": "Access team documentation" } }}
Enhance pull request workflows with AI:
PR Template
## AI Review Checklist- [ ] Security scan passed- [ ] Performance analysis done- [ ] Test coverage adequate- [ ] Documentation updated
## AI Summary<!-- cursor:summary -->
Review Bot
on: [pull_request]jobs: ai-review: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v3 - name: Cursor AI Review run: | cursor review \ --check-security \ --check-performance \ --suggest-improvements
Implementation:
Manual PR Review Workflow in Cursor:
Ctrl+I
)# PR Review Checklist with Cursor
1. **Review Changes:** - Use @Git to see all changes - Ask: "Review @Recent Changes for breaking changes"2. **Security Analysis:** - Ask: "Check @Files for security vulnerabilities" - Reference @Cursor Rules for security guidelines3. **Performance Check:** - Ask: "Analyze performance implications of @Recent Changes"4. **Test Coverage:** - Use @Files to check test files - Ask: "Are there adequate tests for the changes in @Recent Changes?"5. **Code Style:** - Use @Lint Errors to check for style violations - Ask: "Review @Files against our coding standards"
GitHub Integration Script:
#!/bin/bash# Helper script to streamline PR reviews
# Fetch PR changesgh pr checkout $PR_NUMBER
# Open in Cursor with relevant filescursor . --goto "$(gh pr view $PR_NUMBER --json files -q '.files[].path' | head -1)"
# Create review notes fileecho "# PR #$PR_NUMBER Review" > pr-review-notes.mdecho "Use Cursor Agent to review each section" >> pr-review-notes.md
Build team knowledge base:
Document AI patterns
# Team AI Patterns Library
## Pattern: Test-Driven Feature Development
**Context**: New feature implementation**Solution**:
1. Write tests first: "Create comprehensive tests for [feature]"2. Implement: "Make all tests pass"3. Refactor: "Optimize while keeping tests green"
## Pattern: Legacy Code Refactoring
**Context**: Updating old code**Solution**:
1. Add tests: "Create tests for existing functionality"2. Refactor safely: "Modernize code maintaining behavior"
Share effective prompts
// Prompt libraryconst teamPrompts = { security: { audit: 'Scan for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities', fix: 'Fix security issue following team guidelines', }, performance: { analyze: 'Profile and identify bottlenecks', optimize: 'Optimize for sub-100ms response time', }, refactoring: { pattern: 'Apply {pattern} pattern to this code', extract: 'Extract reusable components', },};
Track success metrics
// Team dashboardconst metrics = { avgTimeToFeature: '8h → 3h', codeQualityScore: 'B → A', testCoverage: '65% → 95%', deploymentFrequency: 'Weekly → Daily',};
Manage parallel development effectively:
// Distributed feature developmentconst featurePlan = { epic: "User Dashboard Redesign", breakdown: [ { developer: "Alice", component: "Dashboard Layout", aiTasks: [ "Implement responsive grid system", "Create reusable card components" ] }, { developer: "Bob", component: "Data Visualization", aiTasks: [ "Integrate charting library", "Create real-time updates" ] }, { developer: "Carol", component: "API Integration", aiTasks: [ "Create GraphQL queries", "Implement caching layer" ] } ], integration: "AI to ensure consistent interfaces"};
// AI-assisted merge conflict resolution"Multiple developers modified UserService.Analyze both implementations and suggesta merged version that preserves allfunctionality while following our patterns"
// Cross-component validation"Verify that Alice's Dashboard componentscorrectly integrate with Bob's datavisualization and Carol's API endpoints"
Implement a phased rollout strategy:
Phase 1: Champions (Week 1-2)
Phase 2: Pilot Team (Week 3-4)
Phase 3: Department Rollout (Week 5-8)
Phase 4: Organization-wide (Week 9+)
Track team adoption and impact:
// Team performance dashboardconst teamMetrics = { adoption: { activeUsers: '95%', dailyUsage: '6.5 hours average', featureUtilization: { agent: '85%', inlineEdit: '92%', mcpServers: '73%', }, }, productivity: { velocityIncrease: '2.3x', bugReduction: '67%', codeReviewTime: '-45%', deploymentFrequency: '3x', }, quality: { testCoverage: '+30%', codeComplexity: '-25%', documentationScore: '+80%', },};
AI Usage Guidelines
Document when and how to use AI assistance
Code Ownership
Maintain accountability for AI-generated code
Review Standards
Establish AI-specific code review criteria
Knowledge Sharing
Regular sessions to share tips and patterns
Challenge: Inconsistent AI usage
Challenge: Over-reliance on AI
Challenge: Varying skill levels
As AI tools evolve, successful teams will be those that:
These 112 tips represent the collective wisdom of developers pushing the boundaries of AI-assisted development. The key to success isn’t just individual mastery—it’s creating a team culture that embraces these tools while maintaining high standards for code quality, security, and collaboration.
Remember: AI doesn’t replace developers; it amplifies their capabilities. The teams that thrive will be those that best leverage this amplification while maintaining the human creativity, judgment, and collaboration that great software requires.
This guide is just the beginning. As Cursor and AI development tools evolve, so too will the techniques and patterns for using them effectively. Stay curious, keep experimenting, and share your discoveries with the community.
Ready to transform your development workflow? Start with one tip, master it, then move to the next. Before long, you’ll be working at a level of productivity you never thought possible.
Happy coding! 🚀