Skip to content

Agent Modes Deep Dive: Mastering Cursor's AI Personalities

Agent Modes Deep Dive: Mastering Cursor’s AI Personalities

Section titled “Agent Modes Deep Dive: Mastering Cursor’s AI Personalities”

Each of Cursor’s modes represents a different AI personality, optimized for specific types of tasks. Understanding when and how to use each mode is the difference between fighting the tool and flowing with it.

ModeBest ForCapabilitiesTools Available
AgentComplex features, refactoringAutonomous exploration, multi-file editsAll tools enabled
AskLearning, planning, questionsRead-only exploration, no automatic changesSearch tools only
ManualPrecise, targeted editsDirect file editing with explicit controlEdit tools only
CustomSpecialized workflowsUser-defined capabilitiesConfigurable

Agent Mode: Your Autonomous Coding Partner

Section titled “Agent Mode: Your Autonomous Coding Partner”

Agent mode is Cursor’s most powerful feature. It’s like having a senior developer who can explore your codebase, understand complex requirements, and implement solutions across multiple files.

Feature Implementation

Building new features that touch multiple files and require understanding existing patterns

Large Refactoring

Renaming across the codebase, changing interfaces, updating dependency patterns

Bug Fixing with Investigation

When you need to find and fix issues that span multiple components

Test Generation

Creating comprehensive test suites that understand your code’s behavior

Instead of jumping straight into implementation, use Agent’s planning capabilities:

"First, analyze the authentication system and create a detailed plan for adding OAuth 2.0 support.
Write the plan to plan.md, then wait for my approval before implementing."

This approach:

  • Forces the agent to understand the system before changing it
  • Gives you a chance to review and adjust the plan
  • Results in more thoughtful, less error-prone implementations

With Cursor v1.2+, you can queue multiple agent tasks:

Task 1: "Analyze the current payment processing flow"
Task 2: "Add Stripe integration alongside existing PayPal"
Task 3: "Update all payment-related tests"
Task 4: "Add monitoring and error handling"

The agent will execute these sequentially, maintaining context between tasks.

Before giving Agent a complex task, prime it with context:

"Look at our existing API patterns in /src/api, especially how we handle authentication and error responses.
Now, create a new user management API following these same patterns."

Enable these settings for optimal Agent performance:

{
"cursor.agent.yoloMode": true,
"cursor.agent.yoloPrompt": "Run tests after changes. Create directories as needed. Use TypeScript.",
"cursor.agent.yoloAllowList": ["npm test", "mkdir", "tsc"],
"cursor.agent.yoloDenyList": ["rm -rf", "git push"]
}

Real-World Agent Example: Microservice Extraction

Section titled “Real-World Agent Example: Microservice Extraction”

Here’s how a senior developer used Agent mode to extract a service from a monolith:

  1. Context Gathering

    "Analyze the order processing logic in our monolith.
    Identify all dependencies, database tables, and API endpoints related to orders."
  2. Planning

    "Create a detailed plan for extracting order processing into a microservice.
    Include: API design, data migration strategy, and rollback plan."
  3. Implementation

    "Following the approved plan, create the new order-service with:
    - RESTful API matching our standards
    - Database migrations
    - Docker configuration
    - Integration tests"
  4. Integration

    "Update the monolith to use the new order-service API.
    Implement feature flags for gradual rollout."

Background Agents: Cloud-Powered Parallel Development

Section titled “Background Agents: Cloud-Powered Parallel Development”

Background Agents revolutionize development by allowing you to spawn cloud-based AI agents that work autonomously on separate tasks while you continue coding. Think of them as AI developers working in parallel on different branches of your project.

Parallel Feature Development

Work on multiple features simultaneously - one agent per feature branch

Time-Consuming Tasks

Delegate refactoring, test generation, or documentation while you focus on core logic

Bug Fix Automation

Assign agents to investigate and fix bugs from issue trackers

Code Review Preparation

Have agents prepare PRs with proper formatting, tests, and documentation

Background Agents require a .cursor/environment.json file to configure the cloud environment:

{
"snapshot": "POPULATED_FROM_SETTINGS",
"install": "npm install",
"start": "sudo service docker start",
"terminals": [
{
"name": "Dev Server",
"command": "npm run dev"
},
{
"name": "Test Watcher",
"command": "npm run test:watch"
}
]
}

For complex dependencies, use a Dockerfile:

# .cursor/Dockerfile
FROM ubuntu:22.04
# Install system dependencies
RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y \
build-essential \
python3-pip \
nodejs \
npm \
docker.io
# Set up Python environment
RUN pip3 install pytest black flake8
# Custom tools your project needs
RUN npm install -g typescript eslint prettier
WORKDIR /workspace
  1. Press Cmd+Shift+P (Mac) or Ctrl+Shift+P (Windows/Linux)
  2. Select “Launch Background Agent”
  3. Provide task description and context
  4. Monitor progress in the Background Agent sidebar

Access background agents from any device:

  1. Navigate to cursor.com/agent
  2. Select your repository
  3. Send natural language requests
  4. Track progress on mobile or desktop
@Cursor implement the user dashboard feature from issue #234
- Use our existing design system
- Add proper error handling
- Include unit tests
- Create a PR when done

The agent will:

  • Clone your repository
  • Create a feature branch
  • Implement the feature
  • Push changes and create a PR
  • Notify you in the Slack thread

Example 1: Parallel Feature Implementation

Section titled “Example 1: Parallel Feature Implementation”
// Launch 3 agents simultaneously for different features
// Agent 1: Payment Integration
"Implement Stripe payment integration:
- Add payment processing to /api/payments
- Create checkout flow components
- Add webhook handlers for payment events
- Include comprehensive error handling
- Write integration tests"
// Agent 2: Email Notifications
"Add email notification system:
- Set up email templates
- Create notification service
- Add user preference settings
- Implement queue for bulk emails
- Test with different email providers"
// Agent 3: Analytics Dashboard
"Build analytics dashboard:
- Create dashboard layout
- Implement data visualization components
- Add export functionality
- Cache expensive queries
- Make it responsive"

Cost: ~$4-6 per agent for moderate complexity tasks

// Assign agent to fix a reported bug
"Investigate and fix issue #456:
1. Reproduce the bug using the steps provided
2. Identify root cause in the codebase
3. Implement a fix following our patterns
4. Add regression tests
5. Update relevant documentation
6. Create PR with detailed explanation"

Typical completion time: 10-30 minutes depending on complexity

// Refactor legacy code to modern patterns
"Refactor the legacy authentication system:
- Analyze current implementation in /src/auth
- Migrate from callbacks to async/await
- Update to use JWT tokens
- Maintain backward compatibility
- Update all dependent services
- Ensure all tests still pass
- Document breaking changes if any"

Background Agent Configuration Best Practices

Section titled “Background Agent Configuration Best Practices”
{
"snapshot": "node-18-typescript",
"install": "npm ci --prefer-offline",
"start": "npm run build:watch",
"terminals": [
{
"name": "TypeScript Compiler",
"command": "tsc --watch --preserveWatchOutput"
}
],
"cache": {
"node_modules": true,
"build": true
},
"resources": {
"cpu": 4,
"memory": "8GB"
}
}

Background Agents use MAX mode models exclusively, which can accumulate costs:

Task ComplexityTypical CostDurationBest For
Simple (bug fix, small feature)$2-45-10 minQuick iterations
Medium (feature implementation)$4-810-30 minStandard development
Complex (refactoring, architecture)$8-1530-60 minMajor changes

Coordinating Multiple Agents via Slack:

# Launch multiple agents for a complex feature
@Cursor [branch=feature/api] implement backend API
- Design RESTful endpoints
- Add authentication
- Implement data validation
- Write API tests
@Cursor [branch=feature/ui] build frontend interface
- Create responsive components
- Add state management
- Connect to API
- Implement error handling
@Cursor [branch=feature/tests] create integration tests
- Test API endpoints
- Test UI components
- Add E2E scenarios
- Check performance

After agents complete, integrate the branches:

@Cursor merge feature branches and create final PR
- Combine api, ui, and tests branches
- Resolve any conflicts
- Run full test suite
- Create PR with comprehensive description

Automated Issue Processing with GitHub Actions:

.github/workflows/auto-process-issues.yml
name: Auto Process Issues
on:
issues:
types: [labeled]
jobs:
process:
if: github.event.label.name == 'auto-fix'
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Trigger Cursor Agent via Slack
uses: slackapi/slack-github-action@v1.24.0
with:
channel-id: 'cursor-automation'
slack-message: |
@Cursor fix issue ${{ github.event.issue.html_url }}
- Analyze the issue
- Implement solution
- Add tests
- Create PR linked to issue

Create reusable templates for common tasks:

.cursor/agent-templates/bug-fix.json
{
"name": "Bug Fix Template",
"steps": [
"Reproduce the bug using provided steps",
"Add failing test that demonstrates the bug",
"Implement minimal fix to make test pass",
"Check for similar issues in codebase",
"Add regression tests",
"Update changelog and documentation"
],
"validation": [
"All tests pass",
"No new linting errors",
"Code coverage maintained or improved"
],
"pr_template": "bug_fix"
}

Monitor all active agents in real-time:

  • Current task and progress
  • Files being modified
  • Terminal output
  • Resource usage
  • Estimated completion time

You can seamlessly take over from a background agent:

  1. Click “Take Over” in the agent sidebar
  2. The agent’s work transfers to your local environment
  3. Continue where the agent left off
  4. Agent automatically stops to prevent conflicts
FeatureBackground AgentForeground Agent
Runs WhereCloud (Ubuntu VM)Your local machine
Command ApprovalAuto-runs all (YOLO mode)Requires approval
Parallel WorkYes, multiple agentsNo, single instance
Access MethodIDE, Web, SlackIDE only
CostUsage-based pricingIncluded in subscription
Internet AccessYesDepends on your setup
Git IntegrationAuto-creates PRsManual git operations
Best ForDelegated tasksInteractive development

Security Best Practices:

  1. Never store credentials in code - use environment variables
  2. Review all agent-generated PRs before merging
  3. Use branch protection rules to prevent direct pushes to main
  4. Enable privacy mode when possible (though it limits some features)
  5. Regularly audit agent activity logs

Common issues and solutions:

IssueSolution
Agent fails to startCheck environment.json syntax and ensure all dependencies are specified
Slow performanceOptimize install command, use caching, reduce terminal processes
Git push failuresVerify repository permissions and SSH keys are configured
High costsBreak tasks into smaller chunks, set spending limits, use specific instructions
Environment errorsUse Dockerfile for complex dependencies, test locally first

Ask mode is read-only but incredibly powerful for understanding and planning. It’s your codebase encyclopedia that never makes unwanted changes.

  • Onboarding: Understanding a new codebase or feature area
  • Architecture Decisions: Exploring current patterns before proposing changes
  • Debugging: Understanding code flow without risk of changes
  • Documentation: Getting explanations to write better docs

Don’t just ask one question. Approach from multiple angles:

"How does the authentication system work from these perspectives:
1. User flow (from login to authenticated request)
2. Security measures (token handling, session management)
3. Database structure
4. API endpoints involved
5. Error handling and edge cases"

Use Ask mode to identify patterns and anti-patterns:

"Analyze our React components and identify:
- Common patterns we use for state management
- Inconsistencies in component structure
- Opportunities for creating shared abstractions"

Before making changes, use Ask to understand impact:

"If I change the User interface to add a 'role' field,
what parts of the codebase would be affected?
List all files, functions, and tests that would need updates."

Ask mode becomes even more powerful with MCP servers:

// With context7 MCP enabled
"How do I implement infinite scrolling in Next.js 14?
Use context7 to get the latest documentation."
// With GitHub MCP
"What changes were made to authentication in the last 10 PRs?
Check both merged PRs and comments for context."

Manual mode is for when you know exactly what needs to change and want full control.

  • Hot Fixes: Quick, specific changes in production code
  • Configuration Updates: Changing settings, environment variables
  • Code Reviews: Implementing specific feedback from PRs
  • Sensitive Code: Working on security-critical sections
  1. Be Specific with File Selection

    • Select exact files before entering Manual mode
    • Use @file references for clarity
  2. Provide Clear Instructions

    "In the login function starting at line 45:
    1. Add input validation for email format
    2. Add rate limiting check before authentication
    3. Update the error response to match our API standards"
  3. Use for Teaching Manual mode is excellent for onboarding:

    "Update the calculatePrice function to include tax.
    Follow our existing pattern in calculateShipping."

Custom modes let you create specialized AI personalities for your team’s unique needs.

{
"name": "Security Audit",
"tools": ["codebase_search", "read_file", "terminal"],
"instructions": "Focus on finding security vulnerabilities.
Check for: SQL injection, XSS, hardcoded secrets,
missing authentication. Create security_report.md
with findings and fixes.",
"model": "claude-4.1-opus"
}

A team created a custom mode for database migrations:

// Custom Migration Mode Configuration
{
"name": "DB Migration",
"tools": ["read_file", "edit_file", "terminal"],
"instructions": `
When creating migrations:
1. Always create up and down migrations
2. Test rollback before marking complete
3. Update schema documentation
4. Create migration guide for other devs
`
}

For consistent API design across teams:

{
"name": "API Designer",
"tools": ["codebase_search", "edit_file"],
"instructions": `
Follow REST principles and our API standards:
- Consistent naming (kebab-case)
- Proper HTTP status codes
- Pagination for lists
- Standard error format
- OpenAPI documentation
`
}

The Exploration → Implementation Pattern

Section titled “The Exploration → Implementation Pattern”
  1. Start with Ask Mode

    • Understand the current implementation
    • Identify patterns and dependencies
    • Plan your approach
  2. Switch to Agent Mode

    • Implement the planned changes
    • Let it handle multi-file updates
  3. Finish with Manual Mode

    • Fine-tune specific details
    • Add personal touches
    • Handle edge cases

When switching modes, preserve context:

// In Ask Mode
"Analyze the payment processing flow and identify where we calculate taxes"
// Switch to Agent Mode
"Based on the tax calculation you just found, update it to handle international taxes"
// Switch to Manual Mode
"In the tax configuration file, add specific rates for EU countries"
ModeMemory UsageToken ConsumptionBest Model Choice
AgentHigh (explores many files)Very HighClaude 4 Sonnet (balance)
AskMedium (searches codebase)MediumGemini 2.5 Pro (long context)
ManualLow (specific files)LowAny fast model
CustomVaries by configurationVariesTask-specific
graph TD A[What do you need?] --> B{Type of Task} B -->|Understanding| C[Ask Mode] B -->|Building/Fixing| D{Scope} B -->|Specific Edit| E[Manual Mode] B -->|Special Workflow| F[Custom Mode] D -->|Multiple Files| G[Agent Mode] D -->|Single File| H{Complexity} H -->|Complex Logic| G H -->|Simple Change| E C --> I[Then decide implementation mode] G --> J[Monitor and guide] E --> K[Quick and done] F --> L[Follow mode rules]

The 80/20 Rule

“80% of the time, I’m in Ask mode learning. 20% in Agent mode implementing. This ratio gives me the best results.” - Senior Dev at TechCorp

Mode Macros

Create keyboard shortcuts for common mode switches. Map Ctrl+Shift+A for Agent, Ctrl+Shift+Q for Ask (Q = Question).

Custom Mode Library

Build a library of custom modes for your team. Share them via Git for consistency across developers.

Problem: Agent mode is powerful but can over-engineer simple changes. Solution: Use Manual mode for straightforward edits. Save Agent for complex, multi-file work.

Problem: Developers try to understand code by reading it manually. Solution: Ask mode with good questions is 10x faster. Practice asking comprehensive questions.

Problem: Teams don’t invest in creating custom workflows. Solution: Start with one custom mode for your most common task. Expand gradually.

Now that you understand the nuances of each mode:

  1. Practice Mode Switching: Spend a day consciously choosing modes for each task
  2. Create Your First Custom Mode: Pick your most repetitive task and automate it
  3. Learn Checkpoint Strategies: Continue to the next section to master safe experimentation

Remember: Modes are tools. The best developers know when to use each one. Master this, and you’ll work at a completely different level of efficiency.