Ta treść nie jest jeszcze dostępna w Twoim języku.
Your production system is sluggish during peak hours. Users are complaining about response times. Your monitoring dashboards are red with alerts. Sound familiar? In 2025, performance optimization has evolved from reactive fire-fighting to predictive, AI-driven system tuning that identifies bottlenecks before they impact users.
This guide shows you how DevOps engineers, SREs, and platform teams can leverage Cursor IDE and Claude Code with specialized MCP servers to transform performance optimization from an art into a data-driven science.
@kubernetes @dynatrace "Our e-commerce platform is experiencing
slow response times during peak hours. Analyze our production
environment and identify:
1. Which services are creating the bottleneck
2. Resource utilization patterns across our K8s cluster
3. Database query performance degradation
4. Network latency between microservices
5. Memory pressure indicators
Generate flame graphs and provide actionable optimization plan"
AI Response Example:“I’ve analyzed your production metrics. The bottleneck is in your
payment-service pod which shows 95% CPU utilization during peak hours.
The main culprit is an inefficient database query in the transaction
validation logic that’s executing 10x more frequently than expected.
Additionally, your Redis cache hit rate has dropped to 12%, forcing
expensive database lookups…”
Terminal window
claude"Analyze production performance across our infrastructure and identify bottlenecks"
# Claude integrates with your MCP servers to:
# 1. Query Kubernetes metrics via kubectl-mcp-server
# 2. Pull APM data from Dynatrace
# 3. Analyze logs from multiple sources
# 4. Correlate performance patterns
# 5. Generate optimization recommendations
Claude’s Analysis Process:
Queries pod resource utilization across all namespaces
Analyzes database connection pool metrics
Reviews application traces for slow operations
Examines memory allocation patterns
Correlates user complaints with performance metrics
Let’s walk through a typical performance investigation where an SRE discovers their e-commerce platform’s checkout process is timing out during traffic spikes.
The Scenario: Your checkout service response times have increased from 200ms to 3+ seconds during peak shopping hours. Customer conversion is dropping.
@postgres @kubernetes "Our order dashboard is loading slowly.
The main query takes 8+ seconds during peak hours:
SELECT o.*, c.name, COUNT(oi.id) as items, SUM(oi.total) as amount
FROM orders o
JOIN customers c ON o.customer_id = c.id
JOIN order_items oi ON o.id = oi.order_id
WHERE o.created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '30 days'
GROUP BY o.id, c.name
ORDER BY o.created_at DESC
LIMIT 100;
Please analyze execution plan, suggest optimizations, and provide
the rewritten query with proper indexing strategy."
AI Analysis Response:“I’ve identified several optimization opportunities:
1. Missing Index: No composite index on orders.created_at + customer_id2. Inefficient Join: The order_items join happens before filtering3. Unnecessary Grouping: Can be eliminated with window functions4. Memory Usage: Large result set processing in memory
Here’s the optimized approach with 90% performance improvement…”
- Current pool: min=5, max=25 connections per service
- We have 8 microservices connecting to the same DB
- During peak: connection timeouts and 'too many clients' errors
- Average query time: 50ms, but spikes to 3+ seconds
Recommend optimal connection pool configuration for our workload."
AI Optimization Strategy:“Based on your metrics, I recommend:
1. Reduce pool sizes: Each service should use max=10 connections2. Add connection queue: Configure timeout=30s, queue=203. Enable query batching: Reduce connection pressure4. Add read replicas: Distribute SELECT queries5. Connection multiplexing: Use PgBouncer in transaction mode”
@kubernetes "Analyze our current auto-scaling configuration:
Current HPA settings:
- payment-service: CPU 70%, Memory 80%, min=3, max=10
- order-service: CPU 60%, Memory 75%, min=2, max=15
- notification-service: CPU 50%, Memory 70%, min=1, max=5
Issues observed:
- Scaling events happen too frequently (every 2-3 minutes)
- Services scale up rapidly but scale down slowly
- CPU spikes to 95% before scaling triggers
Recommend optimal HPA configuration for stable performance."
AI Optimization Strategy:“Your scaling is too reactive. Here’s my recommended approach:
1. Lower CPU thresholds: Scale at 50% CPU instead of 70%2. Add custom metrics: Include request rate and response time3. Implement predictive scaling: Scale based on time patterns4. Stabilization windows: 5min scale-up, 15min scale-down5. Resource requests: Right-size requests to improve scheduling”
Setting up comprehensive performance monitoring requires connecting multiple observability tools. Here’s how AI assistants help you design monitoring strategies:
Start with monitoring - You can’t optimize what you don’t measure
Use AI for pattern recognition - Let AI find bottlenecks you’d never discover manually
Focus on user impact - Optimize for perceived performance and business metrics
Automate everything - From testing to monitoring to optimization implementation
Build performance culture - Make performance everyone’s responsibility, not just ops
Performance optimization in 2025 is about building intelligent systems that continuously improve themselves. By leveraging AI assistants with specialized MCP servers, DevOps teams can transform reactive performance firefighting into proactive, predictive performance engineering.