Przejdź do głównej zawartości
Developer Toolkit

On-Call Automation

Ta treść nie jest jeszcze dostępna w Twoim języku.

The 3 AM page is every SRE’s nightmare. But what if your AI assistant could handle the initial investigation, correlate signals across multiple monitoring systems, and even execute remediation scripts while you’re still putting on your shoes? With MCP servers connecting Cursor IDE and Claude Code to your entire observability stack, on-call automation is transforming from dream to reality.

Why On-Call Automation Matters

Section titled “Why On-Call Automation Matters”

Traditional incident response creates a perfect storm of problems:

  • Alert fatigue drowning teams in false positives
  • Context switching between 6+ monitoring tools during an incident
  • Knowledge bottlenecks where only one person knows how to fix critical systems
  • Manual correlation taking precious minutes while customers suffer
  • Incomplete post-mortems because everyone’s exhausted after firefighting

AI-powered incident response through MCP servers changes the game:

  • Intelligent triage automatically correlating alerts across Datadog, Grafana, and Sentry
  • Contextual investigation pulling relevant logs, metrics, and traces in seconds
  • Automated remediation executing tested runbooks for known issues
  • Real-time communication keeping stakeholders informed without manual updates
  • Learning systems that get smarter with every incident

Essential MCP Servers for Incident Response

Section titled “Essential MCP Servers for Incident Response”

Before diving into workflows, let’s set up the MCP servers that connect your AI assistant to critical monitoring and incident management tools.

Core Observability Stack

Section titled “Core Observability Stack”

Installation:

Terminal window
# Claude Code
# Note: Datadog MCP is in Preview - use community alternative for now
claude mcp add datadog -- npx -y @winor30/mcp-server-datadog


# Cursor IDE: Settings › MCP › Add Server
# URL: https://mcp.datadoghq.com/
# Requires: Datadog API key and App key

Capabilities:

  • Query metrics, logs, traces across all services
  • Manage monitors and dashboards
  • Create and update incidents
  • Access service maps and dependencies

Incident Management Integration

Section titled “Incident Management Integration”

Installation:

Terminal window
# Claude Code
claude mcp add pagerduty -- npx -y pagerduty-mcp


# Requires: PagerDuty API token

Use Cases:

  • Query current incidents and on-call schedules
  • Acknowledge and resolve incidents
  • Create incidents for complex issues
  • Access escalation policies and team rosters

Intelligent Alert Correlation

Section titled “Intelligent Alert Correlation”

The first step in effective incident response is cutting through the noise. Instead of drowning in individual alerts, AI can correlate signals across your entire stack to identify the real issues.

Multi-Signal Alert Analysis

Section titled “Multi-Signal Alert Analysis”

Prompt for Comprehensive Alert Analysis:

@datadog @grafana @sentry "Analyze current alerts and incidents:
1. Show me all critical alerts from the last 30 minutes
2. Correlate them by affected services and timing
3. Identify potential root causes from error patterns
4. Suggest which alerts are likely false positives
5. Create an incident summary if multiple signals point to the same issue"

The AI will automatically query multiple monitoring systems, cross-reference timestamps, and present a unified view of what’s actually happening.

Real-World Scenario: Payment Service Degradation

Section titled “Real-World Scenario: Payment Service Degradation”

Imagine you get paged at 2:47 AM for payment service issues. Instead of manually checking multiple dashboards, your AI assistant can instantly provide this analysis:

Automated Correlation Response:

🚨 INCIDENT CORRELATION ANALYSIS


ROOT CAUSE IDENTIFIED: Database connection pool exhaustion


TIMELINE:
• 02:45 - Payment service error rate jumped to 15% (Datadog)
• 02:45 - Database connection timeouts increased 400% (Grafana)
• 02:46 - Queue depth exceeded normal capacity (Prometheus)
• 02:47 - User-facing payment errors spiked (Sentry)


CORRELATED SIGNALS:
✓ Payment API latency P95 > 5s (was 200ms)
✓ Database connection pool utilization at 98%
✓ Recent deployment at 02:30 reduced pool size
✓ No infrastructure issues detected


RECOMMENDED ACTIONS:
1. Rollback deployment from 02:30 (immediate)
2. Temporarily increase DB connection pool
3. Monitor for recovery within 3-5 minutes


CONFIDENCE: 94% (high correlation across 4 data sources)

This analysis, which would normally take 10-15 minutes of manual investigation, happens in seconds.

Automated Incident Investigation

Section titled “Automated Incident Investigation”

Once alerts are correlated, the real work begins: understanding what’s broken and how to fix it. MCP servers enable your AI assistant to conduct thorough investigations across your entire observability stack.

Deep Diagnostic Workflows

Section titled “Deep Diagnostic Workflows”

Complete Incident Investigation Prompt 

@datadog @sentry @github "Investigate payment service incident:


1. METRICS ANALYSIS:
   - Pull error rates, latency, and throughput for payment-api service
   - Compare current values to last 7 days baseline
   - Identify when degradation started


2. ERROR ANALYSIS:
   - Get recent error traces from Sentry
   - Identify most common error patterns
   - Find correlation with specific endpoints or user segments


3. CHANGE CORRELATION:
   - Check recent deployments in the last 4 hours
   - Review any configuration changes
   - Look for related infrastructure changes


4. DEPENDENCY ANALYSIS:
   - Check health of database, cache, and external APIs
   - Verify network connectivity and resource utilization


5. IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
   - Estimate affected user count and revenue impact
   - Identify if specific regions or customer segments are affected


Provide a structured incident report with confidence levels and recommended actions."

This single prompt orchestrates investigations across multiple systems that would normally require opening dozens of dashboards and running complex queries manually.

Sample Investigation Output

Section titled “Sample Investigation Output”

Here’s what your AI assistant might discover during an automated investigation:

Investigation Results:

🔍 PAYMENT SERVICE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION


📊 METRICS ANALYSIS:
• Error rate: 15.7% (baseline: 0.2%) - 78x increase
• P95 latency: 12.3s (baseline: 180ms) - 68x increase
• Throughput: 45% of normal (significant user impact)
• Degradation started: 2024-01-15 02:45:23 UTC


🚨 TOP ERRORS (from Sentry):
1. ConnectionTimeoutError: 67% of errors
   - Database connection pool exhausted
   - Affects payment processing and order updates


2. PaymentGatewayTimeout: 23% of errors
   - Cascading effect from slow database queries
   - User checkouts failing after 30s timeout


⚡ RECENT CHANGES:
• payment-service v2.3.1 deployed at 02:30 UTC
• Database connection pool reduced from 100 to 10 connections
• No infrastructure or configuration changes detected


🔗 DEPENDENCY HEALTH:
• Payment gateway: ✅ Healthy (120ms avg response)
• Redis cache: ✅ Healthy (2ms avg response)
• PostgreSQL: ⚠️ Connection pool 100% utilized
• Kubernetes: ✅ All pods running, no resource constraints


💰 ESTIMATED IMPACT:
• ~2,400 users affected in last 15 minutes
• ~$47,000 in failed transactions
• Affecting all regions, all customer tiers


🎯 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (Confidence: 96%):
1. IMMEDIATE: Rollback to payment-service v2.3.0
2. MONITOR: Watch for recovery within 3-5 minutes
3. FOLLOW-UP: Increase connection pool size before re-deploying
4. PREVENT: Add connection pool monitoring to prevent recurrence

Automated Remediation Workflows

Section titled “Automated Remediation Workflows”

For well-understood issues, AI can move beyond diagnosis to actual remediation. This is where the real power of on-call automation shines.

Prompt for Automated Fix:

@github @kubernetes "Execute safe remediation for database connection issue:


1. Verify this is a known pattern from previous incidents
2. If confidence > 90%, execute these steps:
   - Create rollback PR for payment-service
   - Scale up connection pool temporarily via config map
   - Monitor key metrics for 5 minutes
   - Alert if metrics don't improve
3. Document all actions taken for incident report
4. Keep me informed of progress every 30 seconds


SAFETY CONSTRAINTS:
- Only proceed if similar incidents had successful rollbacks
- Require confirmation before any production changes
- Stop immediately if any metrics worsen"

Runbook Automation Examples

Section titled “Runbook Automation Examples”

Here are prompts for common incident patterns that can be safely automated:

Memory Leak Detection and Restart:

@datadog @kubernetes "Handle high memory usage incident:
1. Confirm memory usage > 90% for > 5 minutes
2. Check if this matches known memory leak pattern
3. If pattern matches, perform rolling restart of affected pods
4. Monitor for memory stabilization
5. Create follow-up task for memory leak investigation"

Database Connection Pool Exhaustion:

@grafana @github "Handle connection pool exhaustion:
1. Verify connection pool is at 100% capacity
2. Check if recent deployment changed pool configuration
3. Temporarily increase pool size via emergency config
4. Monitor for connection availability recovery
5. Plan permanent fix for next deployment window"

Cascading Failure Prevention:

@datadog "Prevent cascading failure in payment system:
1. Detect error rate spike in upstream service
2. Enable circuit breaker for affected downstream services
3. Activate degraded mode (cached responses where safe)
4. Scale up healthy services to handle additional load
5. Monitor for stabilization across service mesh"

Advanced On-Call Scenarios

Section titled “Advanced On-Call Scenarios”

Let’s explore complex scenarios where AI-powered incident response really shines, handling situations that would normally require multiple team members and hours of investigation.

Scenario 1: Cascading Microservice Failure

Section titled “Scenario 1: Cascading Microservice Failure”

The Problem: Your e-commerce platform starts showing checkout failures. Initial alerts suggest payment service issues, but it’s actually a complex cascade starting from inventory service.

Comprehensive Analysis Prompt:

@datadog @sentry @kubernetes "Investigate checkout failure cascade:


PHASE 1 - Service Map Analysis:
1. Build complete dependency graph for checkout flow
2. Identify all services in payment processing chain
3. Check health status of each service in the flow


PHASE 2 - Failure Propagation:
1. Find the earliest failing component in timeline
2. Trace how failures propagated downstream
3. Identify which timeouts and retries amplified the problem


PHASE 3 - Root Cause:
1. Find the actual service that started failing first
2. Determine what changed in that service recently
3. Estimate how long until complete system failure


PHASE 4 - Prioritized Actions:
1. Identify minimum fix to stop cascade
2. Suggest circuit breakers to implement immediately
3. Plan full recovery sequence"

Scenario 2: Database Performance Degradation

Section titled “Scenario 2: Database Performance Degradation”

The Problem: Multiple services are experiencing slow database queries, but it’s not obvious which queries are causing the bottleneck.

Automated Investigation Prompt:

@datadog @grafana "Diagnose database performance issue:


1. QUERY ANALYSIS:
   - Identify slowest running queries in last 30 minutes
   - Find queries with highest resource consumption
   - Check for table locks and blocking queries


2. RESOURCE UTILIZATION:
   - Database CPU, memory, and disk I/O trends
   - Connection pool utilization across all services
   - Buffer hit rates and cache effectiveness


3. CHANGE CORRELATION:
   - Recent schema changes or index modifications
   - New deployments that might include problematic queries
   - Configuration changes to database or connection pools


4. MITIGATION OPTIONS:
   - Can problematic queries be killed safely?
   - Should we temporarily disable non-critical features?
   - Is read replica failover an option?


Provide specific SQL commands to investigate and fix."

Scenario 3: Multi-Region Outage

Section titled “Scenario 3: Multi-Region Outage”

The Problem: Users in certain geographic regions are experiencing complete service unavailability, while others are fine.

Regional Investigation Workflow:

@datadog @cloudflare "Investigate regional service outage:


1. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS:
   - Compare request volumes by region over last 2 hours
   - Identify which regions are affected
   - Check CDN and load balancer health per region


2. INFRASTRUCTURE STATUS:
   - Verify cloud provider service status for affected regions
   - Check network connectivity between regions
   - Analyze DNS resolution patterns


3. SERVICE DEPLOYMENT:
   - Compare service versions deployed across regions
   - Check if regional configuration differences exist
   - Verify database replication lag between regions


4. RECOVERY STRATEGY:
   - Can traffic be rerouted to healthy regions?
   - Are regional deployments rollback-able?
   - Should we enable disaster recovery procedures?


Focus on fastest path to restore service for affected users."

Communication and Stakeholder Management

Section titled “Communication and Stakeholder Management”

During incidents, communication can make the difference between a minor hiccup and a customer exodus. AI can automate much of this burden while keeping everyone properly informed.

Automated Status Updates

Section titled “Automated Status Updates”

Intelligent Communication Automation 

@slack @pagerduty "Manage incident communication:


1. INITIAL NOTIFICATION (within 2 minutes):
   - Create incident in PagerDuty with proper severity
   - Post to #incidents-critical Slack channel
   - Include impact estimate and initial findings
   - Tag appropriate on-call engineers and team leads


2. REGULAR UPDATES (every 10 minutes):
   - Summarize investigation progress
   - Update ETA based on current remediation efforts
   - Highlight any changes in scope or impact
   - Escalate if resolution is taking longer than expected


3. STAKEHOLDER BRIEFINGS:
   - Send executive summary to leadership if revenue impact > $50k
   - Update customer support team with user-facing impact
   - Prepare status page update if customer-facing services affected


4. RESOLUTION COMMUNICATION:
   - Confirm all metrics have returned to normal
   - Provide final impact numbers
   - Schedule post-mortem meeting
   - Thank responders and document lessons learned


Adapt communication tone and frequency based on incident severity."

Sample Automated Updates

Section titled “Sample Automated Updates”

Here’s what automated incident communication looks like in practice:

Initial Alert (Auto-generated):

🚨 INCIDENT #2024-0115-001 - Payment Service Degradation


SEVERITY: Critical
STATUS: Investigating
IMPACT: ~15% error rate in payment processing
ETIMATED USERS AFFECTED: ~2,400
REVENUE IMPACT: ~$47k in last 15 minutes


INITIAL FINDINGS:
• Database connection pool exhaustion detected
• Recent deployment (02:30 UTC) likely cause
• Rollback in progress


NEXT UPDATE: 03:05 UTC (10 minutes)
INCIDENT COMMANDER: @sarah.oncall
RESPONSE TEAM: @payments-team @sre-team

Progress Update (Auto-generated):

📊 UPDATE #2024-0115-001 - Payment Service Degradation


STATUS: Implementing Fix
PROGRESS: Rollback 60% complete
ERROR RATE: Decreased to 8% (was 15%)
RECOVERY ETA: 5-8 minutes


ACTIONS TAKEN:
✅ Root cause identified (connection pool config)
✅ Rollback initiated to previous version
⏳ Monitoring metrics for improvement
⏳ Preparing post-incident analysis


NEXT UPDATE: 03:15 UTC or when resolved

Resolution Notice (Auto-generated):

✅ RESOLVED #2024-0115-001 - Payment Service Degradation


DURATION: 23 minutes (02:45 - 03:08 UTC)
FINAL IMPACT: 2,847 affected transactions, $52k delayed revenue
RESOLUTION: Rollback to payment-service v2.3.0


METRICS CONFIRMED HEALTHY:
• Error rate: 0.1% (normal)
• Response time: 185ms P95 (normal)
• Throughput: 98% of baseline


FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS:
📅 Post-mortem scheduled for tomorrow 10:00 AM
🔧 Connection pool monitoring to be implemented
📋 Deployment process review with platform team


Thanks to @sarah.oncall @mike.payments @lisa.sre for rapid response!

Smart Escalation and On-Call Management

Section titled “Smart Escalation and On-Call Management”

Not every incident requires the same response. AI can intelligently determine who should be involved based on the type of issue, its severity, and team expertise.

Intelligent Escalation Logic

Section titled “Intelligent Escalation Logic”

Smart Escalation Prompt:

@pagerduty "Determine optimal escalation for current incident:


1. INCIDENT ANALYSIS:
   - What type of technical issue is this? (database, network, application, infrastructure)
   - What's the business impact level?
   - Are there any similar recent incidents?


2. TEAM EXPERTISE MATCHING:
   - Who has resolved similar issues before?
   - Which team members have relevant on-call experience?
   - Are any subject matter experts currently available?


3. ESCALATION STRATEGY:
   - Should this go to primary on-call first, or escalate immediately?
   - Do we need multiple teams involved simultaneously?
   - Should we engage management given impact level?


4. COMMUNICATION PLAN:
   - Who needs to be kept informed?
   - What level of detail should different stakeholders receive?
   - How frequently should we provide updates?


Provide specific @mentions and escalation timeline."

Handoff Automation

Section titled “Handoff Automation”

When shifts change during long incidents, smooth handoffs are critical:

Automated Handoff Preparation:

@datadog @pagerduty "Prepare on-call handoff briefing:


1. CURRENT INCIDENTS:
   - Status of all active incidents
   - Actions taken and results so far
   - Next steps planned for each incident
   - Key metrics to monitor


2. RECENT RESOLUTIONS:
   - Incidents closed in last 4 hours
   - Any follow-up actions required
   - Patterns or trends to watch for


3. SYSTEM HEALTH:
   - Services currently in degraded state
   - Scheduled maintenance windows coming up
   - Known issues that might trigger alerts


4. ESCALATION CONTACTS:
   - Who to call for different types of issues
   - Any team members currently unavailable
   - Special procedures for high-impact incidents


Format as a clear briefing document for incoming on-call engineer."

Post-Incident Analysis and Learning

Section titled “Post-Incident Analysis and Learning”

The real value of incident response comes from learning and preventing future occurrences. AI can transform post-mortem generation from a tedious chore into an insightful analysis.

Automated Post-Mortem Generation

Section titled “Automated Post-Mortem Generation”

Comprehensive Post-Mortem Creation 

@datadog @sentry @github @slack "Generate complete post-mortem for incident #2024-0115-001:


1. INCIDENT TIMELINE:
   - Reconstruct exact sequence of events from monitoring data
   - Include all actions taken by responders
   - Correlate with deployments, configuration changes, and external events
   - Identify decision points and response times


2. IMPACT ANALYSIS:
   - Calculate precise user and revenue impact
   - Identify which customer segments were most affected
   - Analyze geographic and demographic patterns
   - Compare to SLA and error budget implications


3. ROOT CAUSE DEEP DIVE:
   - Technical root cause with supporting evidence
   - Contributing factors and systemic issues
   - Why existing monitoring didn't catch this sooner
   - How the issue propagated through the system


4. RESPONSE EFFECTIVENESS:
   - What went well during incident response
   - Where response could have been faster or more effective
   - Communication effectiveness and stakeholder satisfaction
   - Automation opportunities identified


5. PREVENTION PLAN:
   - Specific technical changes to prevent recurrence
   - Monitoring and alerting improvements needed
   - Process changes for faster detection and response
   - Long-term architectural improvements


Format as professional post-mortem document with action items and owners."

Pattern Recognition Across Incidents

Section titled “Pattern Recognition Across Incidents”

AI excels at finding patterns humans might miss across months or years of incident data:

Trend Analysis Prompt:

@datadog "Analyze incident patterns over last 90 days:


1. RECURRING ISSUES:
   - Which types of incidents happen most frequently?
   - Are there services that fail repeatedly?
   - Do incidents cluster around specific times or events?
   - Which root causes keep appearing?


2. SEASONAL PATTERNS:
   - Do certain types of failures correlate with traffic spikes?
   - Are there deployment day patterns?
   - How do incidents vary by day of week or time of day?
   - Are there holiday or maintenance window correlations?


3. PREVENTION OPPORTUNITIES:
   - Which incidents could have been prevented with better monitoring?
   - Where would automated remediation have helped?
   - What architectural changes would eliminate entire classes of issues?
   - Which services need reliability improvements most urgently?


4. RESPONSE IMPROVEMENTS:
   - How has our MTTR (Mean Time To Resolution) changed?
   - Which types of incidents take longest to resolve and why?
   - Are we getting better at initial diagnosis?
   - Where do communication delays most commonly occur?


Provide actionable recommendations with estimated effort and impact."

Sample Pattern Analysis Output

Section titled “Sample Pattern Analysis Output”
📊 90-DAY INCIDENT PATTERN ANALYSIS


🔄 TOP RECURRING ISSUES:
1. Database connection exhaustion (8 incidents)
   • Always related to connection pool configuration
   • Average resolution time: 12 minutes
   • Prevention: Automated connection pool monitoring


2. Memory leaks in payment service (5 incidents)
   • Occurs ~2 weeks after deployments
   • Always requires service restart
   • Prevention: Automated memory usage alerting + restart


3. External API timeouts (12 incidents)
   • Payment gateway and shipping APIs most common
   • Usually during high traffic periods
   • Prevention: Circuit breakers + better timeout handling


📈 TRENDS IDENTIFIED:
• 40% of incidents happen between 2-4 AM UTC (deployment window)
• Black Friday week had 3x normal incident rate
• Memory-related issues increase 2x after major releases
• Database issues cluster around connection pool changes


💡 PREVENTION OPPORTUNITIES:
• 60% of incidents preventable with better monitoring
• 35% could be auto-remediated without human intervention
• Connection pool monitoring alone would prevent 8 incidents/quarter
• Automated deployment rollbacks could reduce MTTR by 40%


🎯 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS (Priority Order):
1. Implement connection pool monitoring (2 dev days, prevents 8 incidents/quarter)
2. Add memory leak detection + auto-restart (3 dev days, prevents 5 incidents/quarter)
3. Improve external API circuit breakers (5 dev days, prevents 12 incidents/quarter)
4. Automated deployment health checks (8 dev days, reduces MTTR 40%)


ROI ESTIMATE: 18 dev days investment = 45% reduction in incident volume

Proactive Incident Prevention

Section titled “Proactive Incident Prevention”

The ultimate goal of on-call automation isn’t just faster response—it’s preventing incidents before they happen. AI can identify early warning signs and automatically implement preventive measures.

Predictive Monitoring

Section titled “Predictive Monitoring”

Predictive Analysis Prompt:

@datadog @grafana "Identify potential issues before they become incidents:


1. TREND ANALYSIS:
   - Which metrics are trending toward critical thresholds?
   - Are error rates gradually increasing over time?
   - Is memory or CPU usage following concerning patterns?
   - Are response times slowly degrading?


2. PATTERN MATCHING:
   - Do current conditions match pre-incident patterns from historical data?
   - Are we seeing early signs of known failure modes?
   - Is there unusual activity in logs or traces?


3. CAPACITY PLANNING:
   - Will current resource usage exceed limits in next 24 hours?
   - Are connection pools approaching exhaustion?
   - Is database performance degrading due to growth?


4. PREVENTIVE ACTIONS:
   - Should we scale resources proactively?
   - Are there configuration changes that could prevent issues?
   - Should we implement circuit breakers or rate limiting?


Alert me to any concerning trends with recommended preventive actions."

Chaos Engineering Integration

Section titled “Chaos Engineering Integration”

Proactive incident prevention also means regularly testing your systems to find weaknesses before real incidents expose them.

AI-Designed Chaos Experiments:

@kubernetes @datadog "Design chaos experiments based on recent incidents:


1. INCIDENT ANALYSIS:
   - Review last 60 days of incidents for common failure modes
   - Identify failure patterns we haven't tested yet
   - Find services that fail frequently but aren't chaos tested


2. EXPERIMENT DESIGN:
   - Create safe chaos experiments for untested failure modes
   - Design tests that validate our monitoring and alerting
   - Plan experiments that test cross-service dependencies


3. SAFETY MEASURES:
   - Ensure experiments can be stopped immediately if needed
   - Limit blast radius to non-production or isolated services
   - Set up monitoring to track experiment impact


4. LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
   - What monitoring gaps will these experiments reveal?
   - Which runbooks need testing and improvement?
   - How effective are our circuit breakers and fallbacks?


Generate specific chaos experiment configurations and safety procedures."

Example AI-Generated Chaos Test:

# Database connection chaos experiment
apiVersion: chaos-mesh.org/v1alpha1
kind: NetworkChaos
metadata:
  name: payment-db-connection-test
spec:
  action: delay
  mode: one
  selector:
    namespaces: ["production"]
    labelSelectors:
      app: payment-service
  delay:
    latency: "2000ms"  # Simulate slow DB connections
    correlation: "100"
  duration: "5m"
  scheduler:
    cron: "0 14 * * 3"  # Wednesday 2 PM, low traffic
---
# Monitor for expected behaviors during test
apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1
kind: PrometheusRule
metadata:
  name: chaos-experiment-validation
spec:
  groups:
  - name: chaos.validation
    rules:
    - alert: ChaosExperimentEffective
      expr: |
        rate(payment_connection_timeouts_total[1m]) > 0.1
        AND on() label_replace(
          chaos_mesh_experiment_status{name="payment-db-connection-test"},
          "experiment", "$1", "name", "(.*)"
        ) == 1
      for: 30s
      annotations:
        summary: "Chaos experiment successfully triggering expected failures"

Best Practices for On-Call Automation

Section titled “Best Practices for On-Call Automation”

Implementing AI-powered incident response requires careful planning and gradual rollout. Here are proven strategies for success.

Implementation Strategy

Section titled “Implementation Strategy”

  1. Start with Monitoring Integration Set up MCP servers for your core observability tools (Datadog, Grafana, Sentry) and practice basic queries and investigations.

  2. Automate Information Gathering Use AI to collect and correlate data during incidents, but keep all remediation actions manual initially.

  3. Implement Safe Automation Begin with low-risk automated actions like scaling read replicas or enabling circuit breakers with human approval.

  4. Expand to Communication Automate incident updates and stakeholder communication while maintaining human oversight of technical decisions.

  5. Advanced Remediation Only after building confidence and safety mechanisms, enable AI to execute well-tested runbooks automatically.

Safety Guidelines

Section titled “Safety Guidelines”

Human Oversight

Always maintain human oversight for:

  • High-impact production changes
  • Customer data operations
  • Security-related incidents
  • New or unknown failure patterns

Audit Trails

Ensure comprehensive logging of:

  • All automated actions taken
  • Decision-making rationale
  • Human approvals and overrides
  • Outcome tracking and learning

Rollback Procedures

Implement easy rollback for:

  • All automated configuration changes
  • Scaling operations
  • Traffic routing decisions
  • Circuit breaker activations

Learning Loops

Continuously improve through:

  • Post-incident automation reviews
  • Success/failure rate tracking
  • Feedback from on-call engineers
  • Regular safety procedure updates

Success Metrics

Section titled “Success Metrics”

Track these metrics to measure the effectiveness of your on-call automation:

Response Time Metrics:

  • Mean Time to Detection (MTTD): How quickly incidents are identified
  • Mean Time to Diagnosis (MTTD): Time to understand root cause
  • Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR): Total incident duration
  • Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR): Time for full service restoration

Automation Effectiveness:

  • Percentage of incidents where AI provided correct initial diagnosis
  • Success rate of automated remediation actions
  • Reduction in manual investigation time
  • Accuracy of impact assessments and ETAs

Quality Improvements:

  • Reduction in alert fatigue (false positive rate)
  • Increase in first-call resolution rate
  • Improvement in post-mortem completeness
  • Better stakeholder satisfaction scores

Troubleshooting Common Issues

Section titled “Troubleshooting Common Issues”

Even with AI automation, things can go wrong. Here are solutions to common challenges teams face when implementing on-call automation.

Problem: AI assistant can’t connect to monitoring tools

Diagnostic Prompt:

"Debug MCP server connectivity:
1. List all configured MCP servers and their status
2. Test connection to each monitoring tool API
3. Verify authentication tokens and permissions
4. Check network connectivity and firewall rules
5. Validate MCP server versions and compatibility"

Common Solutions:

  • Refresh expired API tokens
  • Update MCP server to latest version
  • Check IP whitelist configurations
  • Verify required API permissions are granted

The Future of On-Call Automation

Section titled “The Future of On-Call Automation”

On-call automation is rapidly evolving. Here’s what’s coming next:

Emerging Capabilities

Section titled “Emerging Capabilities”

Self-Healing Infrastructure: AI systems that automatically detect, diagnose, and remediate common issues without human intervention, learning from each incident to improve future responses.

Predictive Incident Prevention: Machine learning models that identify potential failures hours or days before they occur, enabling proactive prevention rather than reactive response.

Cross-System Intelligence: AI that understands complex relationships between services, infrastructure, and business processes, enabling more sophisticated root cause analysis.

Natural Language Runbooks: Dynamic runbooks that adapt to specific incident contexts, providing step-by-step guidance in natural language rather than rigid procedural documents.

Key Takeaways

Section titled “Key Takeaways”

Transforming your on-call experience with AI automation requires strategic thinking and careful implementation:

Start Smart, Scale Gradually

Section titled “Start Smart, Scale Gradually”

  1. Begin with Information Gathering: Use AI to collect and correlate data across monitoring tools before attempting any automated actions.

  2. Automate the Routine: Let AI handle repetitive tasks like alert correlation, metric gathering, and status updates while humans focus on complex decision-making.

  3. Build Safety First: Implement comprehensive logging, rollback procedures, and human oversight before enabling any automated remediation.

  4. Learn Continuously: Use each incident as a learning opportunity to improve AI responses and prevent similar issues in the future.

Essential MCP Server Setup

Section titled “Essential MCP Server Setup”

For effective on-call automation, prioritize these MCP server integrations:

  • Datadog/Grafana: Core observability and metrics
  • Sentry: Error tracking and debugging context
  • PagerDuty: Incident management and escalation
  • GitHub: Deployment correlation and rollback capabilities
  • Slack: Communication and team coordination

Measure Success

Section titled “Measure Success”

Track the metrics that matter:

  • Faster Response: Reduced MTTR and improved detection times
  • Better Accuracy: Higher confidence in initial diagnoses
  • Reduced Fatigue: Less manual correlation and investigation work
  • Improved Learning: More complete post-mortems and prevention strategies

On-call automation represents a fundamental shift from reactive firefighting to proactive, intelligent incident management. By combining AI capabilities with human expertise through MCP servers, teams can achieve faster response times, more accurate diagnoses, and ultimately, more reliable systems that prevent incidents before they impact customers.

Start with one MCP server, one monitoring tool, and one simple automation. Build confidence through success, then gradually expand your AI-powered incident response capabilities. Your future on-call self will thank you.