Tech leads and engineering managers
AI coding tools for tech leads
A team adopting AI coding agents does not have an individual problem repeated N times. Output rises faster than review capacity, and standards that lived in people's habits stop propagating — which makes shared config files, agreed approval modes and a review process that scales the three things worth settling first.
What actually changes
Review becomes the bottleneck, not writing. When every engineer can produce a forty-file change before lunch, the constraint moves to who reads it — and a team that does not change how it reviews will simply merge less carefully.
Standards stop travelling by osmosis. A convention that used to spread through code review now has to be written into a config file every agent reads, or it will be silently reinvented by each of them.
Recipes for your stack
These are documentation pages, and they come with the subscription.
Which level you are at
Twenty-five questions on shared standards, review-ready output and rollout, placing your team on the ladder. The ladder runs Level 0 to 5 and the scorecard puts a team on 1 to 4, with a 30/60/90-day plan to move everyone up a rung. Free, no account.
Frequently asked questions
What does a team seat cost?
Claude Team Standard is $25/member/month ($20 billed annually), ChatGPT Business is $25/user/month ($20 annually), and Cursor Teams Standard is $40/user/month ($32 annually). Compare included usage as well as seat price.
How do you keep standards consistent across a team?
Put them where every agent reads them: CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or .cursor/rules, committed to the repository. Anything that must happen every time belongs in a hook rather than in a convention people are expected to remember.